Categories
News

President Trump accuses Nancy Pelosi of Rigging the 2020 Election Against Bernie Sanders

On Friday, President Donald Trump hammered House Democrats for delaying the Senate impeachment trial, accusing them of trying to rig the 2020 election against Senator and 2020 Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.

Shortly after Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi successfully impeached President Trump in the House last December, she held on to the impeachment articles for nearly a month. On Thursday, the Speaker finally signed off on the articles of impeachment to send them over to the Senate.






Many people speculate that Speaker Pelosi held onto the articles of impeachment to give 2020 Democratic presidential candidates like Joe Biden an edge considering the other candidates who are also senators, like Senator Sanders, will now be forced to abandon the campaign trail to focus on the Senate impeachment trial.

URGENT POLL: Do you support Trump against Dem impeachment efforts?

“They are rigging the election again against Bernie Sanders, just like last time, only even more obviously,” the President tweeted. “They are bringing him out of so important Iowa in order that, as a Senator, he sit through the Impeachment Hoax Trial. Crazy Nancy thereby gives the strong edge to Sleepy Joe Biden, and Bernie is shut out again. Very unfair, but that’s the way the Democrats play the game. Anyway, it’s a lot of fun to watch!”

The President seems to be onto something considering Sanders himself has admitted that the Senate impeachment trial will hurt his campaign.

Via The Washington Examiner, “Sanders: ‘I would rather be in Iowa’ than sitting in Trump’s impeachment trial”:

Bernie Sanders isn’t happy about being stuck in Washington for President Trump’s Senate trial.

“I would rather be in Iowa today. There’s a caucus there in 2 1/2 weeks. I’d rather be in New Hampshire, and Nevada, and so forth. But I swore a constitutional oath as a United States senator to do my job, and I’m here to do my job,” the Vermont senator told reporters on Capitol Hill on Thursday.

Sanders, 78, added he believed Democrats understood he needed to balance his responsibilities but noted the trial shouldn’t distract them other pressing matters.

“We’ve got to deal with this impeachment trial, but we cannot forget the very serious problems facing the American people,” he said.

More from The Hill, “Sanders says he’s concerned about lost campaign time during impeachment trial”:

Despite being about 1,000 miles from the Hawkeye State, Sanders still hit on a couple of his favorite political themes at an impromptu press conference in the Capitol basement Thursday.

“While we go forward with this impeachment trial, I hope the American people understand that we have not forgotten that in this country, outside of Washington, D.C., today, there are millions of people who are struggling economically, millions of people who cannot afford their prescription drugs or their health care,” he said.

FREE Trump 2020 T-Shirt – Get Yours Today

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

President Trump Sends Stern Message to “Mini Mike” Bloomberg

President Trump doubled down on his attacks of 2020 Presidential candidate “Mini Mike” Bloomberg on Friday, going after him for his false advertising.

“Mini Mike Bloomberg ads are purposely wrong — A vanity project for him to get into the game,” President Trump wrote in a tweet. “Nobody in many years has done for the USA what I have done for the USA, including the greatest economy in history, rebuilding our military, biggest ever tax & regulation cuts, & 2nd A!”






The President also shredded Bloomberg for purposely avoiding the debate stage.

“Mini Mike Bloomberg doesn’t get on the Democrat Debate Stage because he doesn’t want to,” tweeted the President. “He is a terrible debater and speaker. If he did, he would go down in the polls even more (if that is possible!).”

These comments by President Trump are similar to comments he made on Monday.

“Mini Mike Bloomberg is spending a lot of money on False Advertising,” the President said while giving Bloomberg a new nickname. “I was the person who saved Pre-Existing Conditions in your Healthcare, you have it now, while at the same time winning the fight to rid you of the expensive, unfair and very unpopular Individual Mandate and, if Republicans win in court and take back the House of Representatives, your healthcare, that I have now brought to the best place in many years, will become the best ever, by far. I will always protect your Pre-Existing Conditions, the Dems will not!”

The false advertising that President Trump was accusing Bloomberg of was for his attacks on the President over his healthcare stance.

WATCH the ads below:

Check out what Breitbart reported:

Bloomberg is running the same tactics that helped Democrats successfully win the House of Representatives in 2018 — threatening that Republicans’ attempt to repeal Obamacare would remove healthcare coverage for preexisting conditions.

Republicans say, however, that if Obamacare were repealed, it would be replaced by a better plan that would still cover preexisting conditions.

President Trump claimed that he saved coverage for preexisting conditions while working to get rid of the individual mandate requiring all Americans to get health insurance or pay a fine.

The Senate’s attempt to pass a repeal of Obamacare blew up after late Sen. John McCain voted to prevent it from going to conference.

Trump has repeatedly pressed Republicans for a better healthcare plan but has so far promised a better plan if Republicans win big in 2020.

Obamacare itself faces a Supreme Court ruling on its constitutionality.

***Get Your Free USA 45 Hat While Supplies Last***

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

Rand Paul: “The Biden’s Are As Corrupt As the Day is Long”

During an interview on Thursday with Fox News, Republican Senator Rand Paul defended President Trump against the impeachment allegations while hammering the Biden family.






Paul argued that former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden are “as corrupt as the day is long.”

“It goes to the heart of the matter,” Paul said while discussing the Biden-Ukraine corruption scandal. “If the president is being accused of withholding foreign aid, and his argument is, ‘Well, we were studying corruption, and we wanted to know about corruption in Ukraine,’ and I think the Bidens are as corrupt as the day is long. No young man who is the son of a politician gets $50,000 a month who has no experience, working for a Ukrainian oligarch. You know, for goodness sakes — it smells to high heaven. It smells like corruption. And every day on the mainstream media, they say, ‘Oh, there’s no there there. This has been investigated. There is no corruption.’ I think the American people don’t buy it. Here’s the thing: Fair is fair. If they’re going to put the president through this, they’re going to have to have witnesses on both sides.”

WATCH the clip below:

Since Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi finally signed the articles of impeachment to send them over to the Senate, Paul has been very vocal about his feelings toward the Senate impeachment trial.

During an interview on Wednesday, Paul issued a stern warning to GOP Senators, urging them to not fall for the Democrats’ impeachment demands.

Paul started by clarifying if Senate Republicans are intent on having the whistleblower and Hunter Biden testify in the Senate impeachment trial.

“There’s a lot of people who are quiet, so I’ve been kind of loud,” Senator Paul said. “My goal in this is to be done with the impeachment as soon as possible, and probably the best way to do that is actually no witnesses — but, if we’re going to have witnesses we should have witnesses from both sides.”

Paul continued by warning his colleagues to not commit political suicide by allowing Democrats to chose witnesses.

“What I keep trying to convince my colleagues, particularly the ones that might vote to allow the witnesses that the Democrats want to call, is that if they do that and they don’t vote to allow the president to bring his witnesses in, I think the Republican base and Trump supporters are going to be very very unhappy with them. I think it will have electoral consequences — which is sort of my way of saying that maybe they should reconsider having any witnesses at all,” he said. “My hope is some will reconsider and we will just be done with one vote.”

Paul continued by discussing who some of the witnesses may be, noting that “if they end up approving witnesses like Bolton, who I think are harmful, I will insist on a motion that says the president should get to call all witnesses that he or his team deem to be necessary to his defense.”

“I don’t want to limit it, I’m not his lawyer, I don’t want to tell him who he has to call — I’m just going to say anyone. ‘Anyone’ includes people he has mentioned, like Hunter Biden and Joe Biden,” he added.

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

Paul also made it clear that the Biden-Ukraine corruption scandal needs to be a part of the trial.

“The evidence should be presented for their corruption. I think the evidence is pretty damning. The mainstream media just passes over that and says ‘oh well, it’s already been decided there’s no corruption and nothing to see here’, but in reality, most Americans hear that some politician’s son was being paid $50,000 a month and they smell corruption from a mile away.”

“I also think the whistleblower should come in, and the main reason for that is he worked for President Obama, he worked for Joe Biden, he was there when Hunter Biden was receiving this money. My understanding is some of Biden’s aides told him at the time that it was a conflict of interest and he shouldn’t be letting his son do this. The whistleblower ought to be asked ‘what was your opinion then?’”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

CNN Panel Shreds Pelosi For Her “Impeachment Ceremony”

On Wednesday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi held an “impeachment ceremony” where she signed the articles of impeachment to be sent over to the Senate.






Pelosi has constantly tried to convince the American people that she is “sad” and “somber” about impeachment however her actions say differently considering she gave a big smile and passed out impeachment pens during the ceremony.

“So sad, so tragic for our country that the actions taken by the president undermined our national security, to violate his oath of office, and to jeopardize the security of our elections, the integrity of our elections, has taken us to this place,” Pelosi said. “So, today we will make history when the managers walk down the hallway, we will cross a threshold in history, delivering articles of impeachment against the President of the United States for abuse of power and obstruction of the House.”

Pelosi continued: “Yes, it is a fact: When someone is impeached, they are always impeached. It cannot be erased. So I stand by that comment, although I know you don’t like hearing it.”

Pelosi’s clear excitement about impeachment was so alarming that a panel on left-wing CNN even hammered her, calling her composure “unusual” and “jarring.”

“We are used to seeing signing ceremonies,” CNN host Dana Bash began, noting that pens were often handed out when a momentous piece of legislation was passed. “At moments of celebration, when a president is signing legislation, when even sometimes, on a rare occasion, but it has happened when the House sends over a landmark piece of legislation. It was unusual to see that kind of ceremony and handing out the pens and smiling for a picture in this kind of situation where the House Speaker has bent over backwards to say publicly and privately that this is somber and no time for celebration.”

“Understandably it is history and people want to mark the moment,” Bash continued, “But I did not expect to see it.”

CNN political reporter Nia-Malika Henderson agreed, as she called the moment “jarring and certainly off message” especially when you consider how Pelosi has tried to convey that she is “sad” about impeachment.

WATCH the clip below:

CNN reporter Lauren Fox also weighed in on the situation, writing, “So many pens that Pelosi will sign to officially transmit the articles of impeachment and sign resolution appointing House managers. Why so many? They will be given away to members like House managers as a symbol of today.”

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

Rep. Mark Meadows hammered the Speaker, saying, “They claim it’s a somber, serious occasion they’re heartbroken over… and then they pass out impeachment-signing pens with special cases. Folks. You can’t make it up.”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

Rand Paul Warns GOP Senators Not Commit Political Suicide in Senate Trial

During an interview on Wednesday, Senator Rand Paul issued a stern warning to GOP Senators, urging them to not fall for the Democrats’ impeachment demands.






Paul started by clarifying if Senate Republicans are intent on having the whistleblower and Hunter Biden testify in the Senate impeachment trial.

“There’s a lot of people who are quiet, so I’ve been kind of loud,” Senator Paul said. “My goal in this is to be done with the impeachment as soon as possible, and probably the best way to do that is actually no witnesses — but, if we’re going to have witnesses we should have witnesses from both sides.”

Paul continued by warning his colleagues to not commit political suicide by allowing Democrats to chose witnesses.

“What I keep trying to convince my colleagues, particularly the ones that might vote to allow the witnesses that the Democrats want to call, is that if they do that and they don’t vote to allow the president to bring his witnesses in, I think the Republican base and Trump supporters are going to be very very unhappy with them. I think it will have electoral consequences — which is sort of my way of saying that maybe they should reconsider having any witnesses at all,” he said. “My hope is some will reconsider and we will just be done with one vote.”

Paul continued by discussing who some of the witnesses may be, noting that “if they end up approving witnesses like Bolton, who I think are harmful, I will insist on a motion that says the president should get to call all witnesses that he or his team deem to be necessary to his defense.”

“I don’t want to limit it, I’m not his lawyer, I don’t want to tell him who he has to call — I’m just going to say anyone. ‘Anyone’ includes people he has mentioned, like Hunter Biden and Joe Biden,” he added.

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

Paul also made it clear that the Biden-Ukraine corruption scandal needs to be a part of the trial.

“The evidence should be presented for their corruption. I think the evidence is pretty damning. The mainstream media just passes over that and says ‘oh well, it’s already been decided there’s no corruption and nothing to see here’, but in reality, most Americans hear that some politician’s son was being paid $50,000 a month and they smell corruption from a mile away.”

“I also think the whistleblower should come in, and the main reason for that is he worked for President Obama, he worked for Joe Biden, he was there when Hunter Biden was receiving this money. My understanding is some of Biden’s aides told him at the time that it was a conflict of interest and he shouldn’t be letting his son do this. The whistleblower ought to be asked ‘what was your opinion then?’”

Senator Ted Cruz has his own idea of how the Senate Impeachment trial should be conducted. During a meeting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other leaders in the Senate, Cruz brought up an interesting idea that may force former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden to testify in the senate impeachment trial.

Cruz called the idea “witness reciprocity” and would basically allow GOP Senators to call on one witness for every witness that Democrat Senators called on.

Check out what the Daily Wire reported:

Cruz brought up the idea during a meeting with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and GOP leaders, according to Fox News, which added that other people who might be called by the GOP include House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and the whistleblower who publicized a July phone call between Trump and the leader of Ukraine.

McConnell, who consulted with Cruz, senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John Cornyn of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah regarding tactics for the impeachment trial, stated,“We’ll be dealing with the witness issue at the appropriate time into the trial. And I think it’s certainly appropriate to point out that both sides would want to call witnesses if they wanted to hear from them. So if you get to that issue, I can’t imagine that only the witnesses our Democratic colleagues want to call will be called.”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

After Saying How “Sad” She is About Impeachment, Pelosi Grins While Signing Impeachment Articles

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has constantly tried to convince the American people that she is “sad” and “somber” about impeachment however her actions say differently.






While signing the articles of impeachment to send over to the Senate, Pelosi gave a big smile and passed out impeachment pens.

“So sad, so tragic for our country that the actions taken by the president undermined our national security, to violate his oath of office, and to jeopardize the security of our elections, the integrity of our elections, has taken us to this place,” Pelosi said. “So, today we will make history when the managers walk down the hallway, we will cross a threshold in history, delivering articles of impeachment against the President of the United States for abuse of power and obstruction of the House.”

WATCH the clip below:

Pelosi continued: “Yes, it is a fact: When someone is impeached, they are always impeached. It cannot be erased. So I stand by that comment, although I know you don’t like hearing it.”

Many people including some on the left, took the opportunity to slam the Speaker.

CNN reporter Lauren Fox took wrote, “So many pens that Pelosi will sign to officially transmit the articles of impeachment and sign resolution appointing House managers. Why so many? They will be given away to members like House managers as a symbol of today.”

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

Rep. Mark Meadows also hammered the Speaker, saying, “They claim it’s a somber, serious occasion they’re heartbroken over… and then they pass out impeachment-signing pens with special cases. Folks. You can’t make it up.”

Shortly before the signing party, Pelosi announced who she selected to be the “impeachment managers.”

The selections were none other than far-left Democrats House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler, along with Reps. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Val Demings (D-FL), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Jason Crow (D-CO), and Sylvia Garcia (D-TX). Schiff will be the leader out of the group.

“Today is an important day,” Pelosi said during a press conference. “The emphasis is making the strongest possible case to protect and defend our constitution, to seek the truth for the American people.”

WATCH the clip below:

Check out what Breitbart reported:

A House vote to send the articles to the Senate is scheduled for early Wednesday afternoon. The measure is expected to pass. If it does, the Senate trial is expected to begin early next week, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said.

Ahead of the historic trial, the White House is finalizing the legal team that will defend Trump.

Jay Sekulow, Trump’s personal attorney, said he’s part of a legal team headed by White House counsel Pat Cipollone that will defend the president against two impeachable charges that were passed by the House last month. The articles of impeachment — accusing Trump of abusing his power and obstructing Congress — have been held for weeks by House Democrats, who said they first wanted to see a trial blueprint from Senate leaders to ensure a fair process.

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

REPORT: FBI Investigating Ilhan Omar’s ‘Sham Marriage’ — And Now ICE Is Involved

Radical Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar has come under fire several times since becoming a member on Congress one year ago.

Aside from making a slew of anti-Semitic and controversial comments, Omar has been accused of marrying her own brother to commit marriage, tax, and immigration fraud.






And things just kicked up a notch big time after The Blaze reported on Wednesday that the FBI has taken further steps to advance its investigation into the allegations against Omar.

Two federal agencies, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Education, have allegedly been contacted by the FBI in matters related to alleged misconduct by Omar.

The development comes following Minnesota state Rep. Steve Drazkowski’s repeated calls and pleas for an ethics investigation into Omar.

Drazkowski and others have alleged that Omar’s 2009 marriage to a British citizen, who they claim was her brother, was entered into for fraudulent purposes.

Last year, Drazkowski called on the United States House Committee on Ethics to investigate Omar’s “sham marriage.”

“No one is above the law,” Drazkowski said during a press conference in July 2019. “We believe the House Ethics Committee can and should launch an investigation immediately.”

After nothing was done, Drazkowski filed a complaint against Omar with the Minnesota District of the Department of Justice.

The Minnesota lawmaker’s complaint prompted a U.S. attorney appointed by President Donald Trump to direct the FBI to take up the case.

The Blaze reports that in October 2019, the Department of Justice assigned a FBI Special Agent in Charge to review the allegations.

Investigators within ICE and the Department of Education have allegedly been put into contact with the FBI.

While all of this has been happening, Omar has also been accused of having an affair with Tim Mynett, a married man who works closely with her campaign.

***FREE USA Beanie! Get Yours While Supplies Last***

Omar can’t go a week without finding herself engulfed in another disturbing controversy.

Source link

Categories
News

Pelosi Caused Eyes To Roll When She Announced This Impeachment Slogan

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi continues to make a total fool of herself given how poorly she has handled the sham impeachment witch hunt into President Donald Trump.

And she caused some eyes to roll on Wednesday when she unveiled a ridiculous impeachment slogan.






As she prepared to send articles of impeachment over to the Senate on Wednesday, Pelosi repeatedly described the indictment by the House as a permanent stain on his legacy — no matter what happens next.

He’s been impeached forever. They can never erase that,” Pelosi said at a press conference announcing her impeachment managers, who will prosecute the case.

Pelosi said Trump has already been held accountable because the House voted for “an impeachment that will last forever.”

Trump hit back moments later, calling the effort “another Con Job by the Do Nothing Democrats.”

Seems like every time Pelosi opens her mouth, it becomes even more clear that this was a total political hit job aimed at harming Trump just before the 2020 election.

Beyond her ridiculous games and lame slogans, it’s clear to just about everyone how this is going to play out going forward.

Republicans control a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber. To impeach and remove him from office, Democrats need 67 total votes.

That means all 47 Democrats and 20 Republicans would need to vote in favor of convicting Trump and having him removed from office.

That is never going to happen.

***EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Which of these 6 Trump products would you like for FREE?***

In a matter of weeks, it appears the Democrats latest stunt will soon be over and Trump will be fully acquitted.

Source link

Categories
News

Sessions Tells Moderate Republicans To ‘Toughen Up’ And Vote To Immediately Acquit Trump

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions has a message for Republicans on the fence about the looming Senate impeachment trail against President Donald Trump.

During an interview Tuesday night on Fox News, Sessions urged moderate Republicans to “toughen up” and vote to acquit the president in the upcoming trial.






Sessions is firmly on the side of the president when it comes to the House-led, Democrat-initiated impeachment articles drafted against him. 

Sessions called the impeachment process a “terrible abuse” of power and urged Senators not to waste another second on the Democrats’ circus.

“I do think for the Republicans — it is time for them to toughen up,” Sessions began. 

“There is not an impeachment case here. This is a terrible, terrible abuse of the awesome impeachment power, and the first time this has ever happened in our history. And it should not be done, and so the Republicans need to think clearly,” Sessions added.

The former AG went on to argue that Democrats have essentially “weaponized” the impeachment process and set a dangerous precedent for future presidents.

“They need to call it what it is — an abuse of the process. And you’re right — they don’t need to give it any real credibility because the evidence is not going to justify this charge, it seems to me quite clearly,” Sessions said.

Sessions also said he agreed with Kentucky GOP Rep. Rand Paul about calling Hunter Biden to testify if Republicans and Democrats agree to call witnesses in the Senate trial.

The Democratic-controlled House passed a resolution on Wednesday to officially transmit the articles of impeachment against Trump to the Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the trial will begin in the upper chamber as soon as next Tuesday, Jan. 21.

At this point, almost everything has come to fruition. We know how this is going to play out.

Republicans control a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber. To impeach and remove him from office, Democrats need 67 total votes.

That means all 47 Democrats and 20 Republicans would need to vote in favor of convicting Trump and having him removed from office.

***Which FREE Trump gift would you like us to send you?***

t this point, almost everything has come to fruition. We know how this is going to play out.

Republicans control a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber. To impeach and remove him from office, Democrats need 67 total votes.

That means all 47 Democrats and 20 Republicans would need to vote in favor of convicting Trump and having him removed from office.

That is never going to happen.

Source link

Categories
News

Newly Released Emails Show Comey Tried Hiding Fact That ‘Pee’ Dossier Was Totally False

Evidence continues to pile up that top Obama officials knew that the infamous Steele dossier was a fabrication even as they used it go get FISA approval to spy on President Trump’s campaign. 

In a newly released email from the DOJ Inspector General report on FISA abuse, it has been revealed that James Comey pushed the dossier and the salacious contents about peeing prostitutes despite its unreliability. 






The dossier which the disgraced former FBI director tried to blackmail the incoming president with and which was leaked to CNN and BuzzFeed served as the foundation for the coup against Trump, fueled years of propaganda and led to the Mueller witch hunt.

VOTE NOW: Do you OPPOSE or SUPPORT impeachment?

In a damning email to Obama’s intelligence chief James Clapper that as buried within IG Michael Horowitz’s report, Comey admits that the dosser had not been verified but insisted that it be used anyway. 

Breitbart News delivered this smoking bombshell that underscored the dishonesty of the plotters that comes on the eve of the culmination of years of work to reverse the 2016 election with the impeachment trial set to begin in the Senate. 

Via Breitbart, “Email: James Comey Tried to Hide Fact that ‘Pee’ Dossier Wasn’t Corroborated”:

An email reveals disgraced former FBI director James Comey tried unsuccessfully to change a draft public statement from then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper questioning the reliability of the infamous anti-Trump dossier.

Immediately after the dossier was reported in the news media for the first time, the email exchange shows Clapper wanted to release a statement that “[t]he IC [Intelligence Community] has not made any judgment that the information in [the Steele election reporting] is reliable.”

Comey, however, interjected, suggesting a different public statement by Clapper that would not have attacked the credibility of the wild charges made by dossier author Christopher Steele.

The email was sent on January 11, 2017, one day after BuzzFeed infamously published the dossier’s full unverified contents and CNN published the leak that the dossier was included in an official classified January 6, 2017 briefing with President-Elect Donald Trump. There have long been questions about why the unsubstantiated dossier was included in an official classified briefing.

Comey was responding to an email from Clapper that contained a draft media statement to be issued by Clapper for public release.

TRENDING POLITICS READERS: Choose Your FREE Trump Gift Here 

According to Comey’s email:

I just had a chance to review the proposed talking points on this for today. Perhaps it is a nit, but I worry that it may not be best to say “The IC has not made any judgment that the information in the document is reliable.”

I say that because we HAVE concluded that the source [Steele] is reliable and has a track record with us of reporting reliable information; we have some visibility into his source network, some of which we have determined to be sub-sources in a position to report on such things; and much of what he reports in the current document is consistent with and corroborative of other reporting included in the body of the main IC report.

That said, we are not able to sufficiently corroborate the reporting to include in the body of the [ICA] report. That all rings in my ears as more complicated than “we have not made a judgment that the information in the document is reliable.”

It might be better to say that “we have not be [sic] able to sufficiently corroborate the information to include it in the body of our Russia report but, for a variety of reasons, we thought it important to include it in our report to our senior-most audience.”

It isn’t the first time that Comey’s own words have outed him as a bad actor either. 

According to his own memos, the ex-FBI boss admitted that CNN had the dossier and was looking for a “news hook” that it could use as an excuse for foisting off the hoax on the public. 

According Rep. Mark Meadows in an oped for the Washington Examiner:

In the January 2017 briefing, Comey told Trump news organizations “like CNN” had the Russian dossier but were looking for a “news hook” to report on it. Remember, while no outlet had published anything on the dossier to that point, it conveniently took less than a week after the briefing for the dossier’s allegations to become public … via CNN.

This raises the question: Did Comey and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper work together to organize the dossier briefing for the purpose of giving CNN what they wanted — a “news hook”?

Months after the briefing, Comey testified under oath the dossier was “salacious and unverified.” Documents produced to Congress demonstrate FBI officials raised concerns related to the legitimacy of the dossier. The timeline and evidence we have for this time period suggests, yes, it was Comey and Clapper who held a briefing with Trump on a “salacious and unverified” dossier, approached the media with the details of that briefing, and provided cover (a news hook) for reporting the allegations.

Comey’s meeting with Trump gave them that “news hook” and for years, everything else fell into place until the Horowitz report once and for all, drove a stake through the heart of the slimy British spook Steele’s bogus dossier. 

Meanwhile, the investigation into the origins of the plot continue with the intrepid federal prosecutor John Durham expected to bring indictments against a number of those involved. 

One of those indictments may have Comey’s name on it too. 

Source link