Categories
News

Angry Dad Confronts Warren Face-To-Face On Her Student Loan Plan; ‘We Get Screwed’

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren was been slipping in the polls lately, but things just got much worse for the Massachusetts senator after one angry father blasted her face-to-face over her latest bogus policy proposal.






During a campaign stop in Grimes, Iowa, Warren held a “photo opportunity” with voters, where she thought she was just going to take “selfies” with gleeful supporters.

But things took a big turn when an angry father confronted Warren with one question that she apparently didn’t have a great answer for.

The man confronted Warren with questions over her proposed student loan forgiveness program.

“I just wanted to ask one question. My daughter is getting out of school. I’ve saved all my money. She doesn’t have any student loans. Am I going to get my money back?” the man asked Warren.

Warren, obviously caught off-guard, snarkily replied, “Of course not.”

The angry voter’s reply was blunt and to the point.

“So you’re going to pay for people who didn’t save any money and those of us who did the right thing get screwed,” he asked. “My buddy had fun, bought a car, went on vacations. I saved my money,” he said. “He made more than I did. But I worked a double shift, worked extra — my daughter worked since she was 10. So, you’re laughing.”

“No, I’m not,” Warren replied.

The man shot back, saying “Yeah, that’s exactly what you’re doing. We did the right thing, and we get screwed.”

WATCH:

He’s not wrong.

The father — like millions of other Americans — has an issue with Warren’s plan to eliminate up to $50,000 in student loan debt for households currently making less than $100,000 per year. 

For context, that covers roughly 95 percent of those with outstanding student loans. 

Warren has also pledged to put the program into action via executive order the day she takes office — assuming she becomes the next president.

The plan, of course, has an astronomical price tag. 

***EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Which of these 6 Trump products would you like for FREE?***

Voters, like the one who confronted Warren, aren’t happy with the idea that they worked their tails off for many years to put their children through school, while others just entering that phase in life will essentially have no worries whatsoever about student loan debt — which can often be crippling for the average, middle-class American family.

Source link

Categories
News

Ingraham Reveals Emails Connecting Dots Between Obama, Bidens, And Whistleblower

Fox News host Laura Ingraham dropped a bombshell this week after she obtained exclusive emails showing that former President Barack Obama was much more aware of Joe and Hunter Biden’s shady business deals in Ukraine.






During a segment on her Fox program Wednesday night, Ingraham revealed emails connecting the alleged Ukraine whistleblower to a 2016 meeting in the Obama White House about Burisma Holdings, the corrupt Ukrainian gas company that paid Hunter Biden $50,000 a month to sit on its board.

Ukrainian officials have all-but admitted Hunter Biden only sat on the board because his father was serving as the vice president at the time and oversaw Ukrainian policy. 

They were paying Hunter big money to influence policy.

“As far as I’m concerned, the entire impeachment drama comes back to one person — the whistleblower,” Ingraham said. 

“Democrats all of a sudden want you to believe this person is unimportant for their case against Trump… But tonight, the Ingraham angle obtained exclusive documents that show just how important he or she is,” she added.

Ingraham was able to corroborate a newly-uncovered email conversation between State Department emails and New York Times journalist Ken Vogel — whose reporting shed light on Hunter Biden’s questionable position on Burisma — with the whistleblower, who is likely former Ukraine director on the National Security Council Eric Ciaramella.

In 2016, the whistleblower checked in several Ukrainian leaders and prosecutors to the White House that would be critical in arranging a partnership between Hunter Biden, Burisma, and the Obama administration — which is what Trump may have asked about on the July 25 call with Ukrainian President Zelensky.

WATCH:

In his email, Vogel told the Obama State Department:

“We are going to report that [State Department official] Elizabeth Zentos attended a meeting at the White House on 1/19/2016 with Ukrainian prosecutors and embassy officials as well as … [redacted] from the NSC … the subjects discussed included efforts within the United State government to support prosecutions, in Ukraine and the United Kingdom, of Burisma Holdings, … and concerns that Hunter Biden’s position with the company could complicate such efforts.”

Here’s an excerpt from Washington Examiner on the rest of the story:

Using archived Obama White House visitor logs, Ingraham said her team was able to corroborate details of the January 2016 meeting, showing on the screen the names of Ukrainian officials checked into the White House by Ciaramella, who was Ukraine director on the National Security Council.

Ingraham said the story was never published and reached out to Vogel and the New York Times to ask why the report never came to fruition. While Vogel did not reply, Ingraham said the New York Times director of communications simply stated that Vogel’s request for comment was consistent with their news-gathering process.

Still, Ingraham said that “the timing of their request and the subsequent squashing of the story are very interesting,” noting how Joe Biden announced his candidacy for president on April 25, one week before Vogel’s request. She speculated a number of possibilities, including that Joe Biden’s campaign somehow got the New York Times to drop the story.

We’ve learned some very troubling information in recent months about the alleged whistleblower.

Ciaramella, the rumored whistleblower, is: (1) a registered Democrat; (2) worked for Obama and Joe Biden when they were in the White House; (3) is a vocal critic of Trump; (4) helped initiate the Russia “collusion” hoax; and (5) was fired from the National Security Council in 2017 for leaks, and returned to the CIA.

***EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Which of these 6 Trump products would you like for FREE?***

Apparently Ciaramella is much closer to Obama, Biden, and top Democrats than many realized.

Source link

Categories
News

Ratings For Opening Day Of Trump’s Impeachment Trial Bomb

While Democrats still desperately want Americans to believe President Donald Trump is a threat to our democracy and must be removed from office — the numbers show that hardly anyone cares.






According to Reuters, 9 million Americans tuned in for the opening day of Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate — which aired across six cable and broadcast television networks.

While that number sounds impressive off of the top, when compared to the televised House hearings last year — in which several rounds of witnesses provided live testimony — the numbers are lower by several million. 

The House impeachment hearings opening day managed to draw 14 million viewers.

Tuesday’s Senate impeachment trial lasted a mind-numbing 13 hours and consisted of countless arguments between both sides, with Democrats pushing a series of attempts to amend the rules set for the trial by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

The trial was so boring and difficult to watch that most cable news networks — including left-wing CNN and MSNBC — stopped showing the trial live and aired more of it’s routine programming with periodic check-ins on the Senate floor.

One of the only noteworthy moments came when House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff had quite the slip of the tongue on Wednesday and admitted the real reason why Democrats are trying so hard to remove the president.

While speaking from the Senate floor, Schiff revealed that Democrats’ partisan impeachment is about stopping President Donald Trump from being re-elected.

***EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Which of these 6 Trump products would you like for FREE?***

Quite amazing to see him so openly brag that Democrats do not want the upcoming election decided by actual voters.

Source link

Categories
News

BREAKING: President Trump Unveils The Official ‘Space Force’ Logo

Moments ago, President Trump unveiled the brand new logo for the sixth branch of our military – SPACE FORCE!

Here’s what he tweeted:






“After consultation with our Great Military Leaders, designers, and others, I am pleased to present the new logo for the United States Space Force, the Sixth Branch of our Magnificent Military!”

If the tweet above doesn’t populate, here’s the image again:

How badass is that image?!?!?!

The Space Force was signed into law Dec. 20, 2019 as part of the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act. SpaceForce.mil went live shortly thereafter.

On June 18, 2018, President Donald Trump directed the Pentagon to begin planning for a Space Force: a 6th independent military service branch to undertake missions and operations in the rapidly evolving space domain. The U.S. Space Force would be the first new military service in more than 70 years, following the establishment of the U.S. Air Force in 1947.

What do YOU think about this new logo? Comment below with your thoughts!

Source link

Categories
News

Cuomo Says Thunberg Criticism Is Off Limits, Fails To Mention CNN Covington Lawsuit

On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin trolled far-left teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg when he was asked by a reporter about her attacks on the economic reliance on fossil fuels.






Mnuchin responded to the reporter by simply saying, “After she goes and studies economics in college, she can go back and explain that to us.”

The comment immediately sent the entire Democratic party into a frenzy and even sent multiple members in the media off the edge.

The Washington Examiner reports: “Anyone with an ounce of common sense understands that it is perfectly reasonable for the secretary of the Treasury Department to laugh off economic advice from a 17-year-old girl who has been so scared out of her mind by grown-ups that she won’t even attend school. It seems par for the course to point out her lack of qualifications to lecture the world on climate, economics, or anything else. But Cuomo couldn’t seem to bear Mnuchin’s comments.”

CNN host Chris Cuomo lost his cool when he tweeted, “Why do these trumpers think it is ok to go at a kid?”

The tweet by the left-wing CNN host immediately backfired as Twitter users reminded him that CNN was forced to pay Nick Sandmann millions of dollars after they accused him of being racist for smirking.

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

“Your network had to pay a settlement to a 17-year-old for smearing him as a racist for smirking,” replied Greg Price.

Check out what else the Washington Examiner noted relating to the falsehoods and hypocrisy regarding Cuomo’s statement:

There’s so much to ridicule in Cuomo’s attack that it’s hard to know where to begin.

For one, Mnuchin didn’t “go at a kid.” The secretary was specifically asked about Thunberg by a reporter, so he didn’t exactly go out of his way to bring her up. And she’s not some random child. (Is 17 really a “kid” now?) Thunberg was literally Time’s Person of the Year for 2019 and has been heralded by liberals and climate activists across the world as a savior. In fact, the global Left has treated Thunberg with almost cult-like reverence. She has lectured the United Nations and the world about what’s best for global economic and environmental policy despite, frankly, understanding very little about the subject.

When a young person is propped up, harmfully so, by liberals as an ideological advocate worth listening to, it’s more than fair to criticize her ideas or qualifications. They can’t just use her as an intellectual human shield. What part of this doesn’t Cuomo understand?

Of course, there are some conservatives who have taken their criticism of Thunberg too far and entered the territory of cruel ad hominem, but no one could accuse Mnuchin of such a thing. His lighthearted criticism was well within the boundaries of fair debate and good taste.

Plus, it’s extremely hypocritical for CNN’s Cuomo, of all people, to say it’s wrong to criticize young people. Both his network and Cuomo himself falsely smeared Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann as an evil racist just to suit their narrative about Trump supporters. (For more on the entire fiasco, read Robby Soave’s one-year review.) They just had to settle a massive lawsuit because of their false attacks on a “kid.”

All in all, the liberal media’s approach to Greta Thunberg is just tiring. If you’re going to scold us with Thunberg’s advocacy, don’t freak out whenever someone dares to question her infinite wisdom.

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

As Thousands Attend ‘March For Life’, Bernie Tweets ‘Abortion Is Healthcare’

On Friday, thousands gathered in downtown Washington D.C. for the 47th annual March for Life event. President Donald Trump even attended the event which made him the first president in history to show up to the gathering.






“Unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House,” the President said as the crowd erupted with cheers.

While President Trump and the other pro-lifers marched for the rights of unborn babies, far-left socialist Senator Bernie Sanders decided to weigh in by expressing his feelings toward aborting unborn babies.

“Abortion is health care,” the radical socialist tweeted.

The tweet immediately received backlash from conservative Twitter users. Katie Pavlich quoted the tweet, saying, “Take note. Bernie will take more of your hard earned money to fund abortion.”

***The Best Looking Trump Beanie On The Planet – YOURS FREE***

The Daily Wire tweeted: “Babies would disagree.”

The March for Life turned out to be a total success. Check out what USA Today reported:

In a pivotal year in the legal battle over abortion, tens of thousands of anti-abortion activists gathered in Washington, D.C., on Friday for the annual March for Life that featured President Donald Trump as the first sitting president to appear in person at the event in its 47-year history.

Calling it a “profound honor” to be the first president to attend, he said that “unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House,” citing his own actions.

“When it comes to abortion … Democrats have embraced the most radical and extreme positions,” Trump said.

In some ways, his speech resembled the ones he gives at campaign rallies. He recited praise for the size of the crowd, bragged about the number of federal judges he has appointed, and attacked Democrats over social policy.

Trump also appeared to make a reference to impeachment by telling abortion opponents: “They are coming after me because I am fighting for you.”

In his speech at the rally, Trump made a special appeal to women, saying they are using the power of “their votes” to fight abortion.

Following his remarks, the audience responded with chants of “four more years.” 

In an apparent nod to the powerful impact of women voters in the last two elections, the theme for this highly contentious election year is “Life Empower: Pro-life is Pro-Woman.”

The march is the centerpiece for three days of activities that include a youth rally, a Christian rock concert and an expo featuring anti-abortion organizations and ministries.

Participants of the event explained why they decided to come out to the event and support the pro-life movement.

“We are fighting for women and babies,” said march participant Frances Floresca who also said that the March for Life was “the real Women’s March.”

“We’re standing for the women who need to be strong so they don’t get an abortion,” she added.

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

Schiff Says Trump Needs to be Impeached Because Russia Will Attack the US Mainland

Although the impeachment trial is now in the hands of the Senate, troubled Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff has brought his “Schiff show” to the Senate and is promoting every falsehood and conspiracy theory he has ever made.






During the impeachment trial on Wednesday, Schiff said that Russia would attack the United States mainland and the only way of preventing this would be to remove President Trump from office.

Check out what Fox News reported:

Trump’s lawyers sat by, waiting their turn, as the president blasted the proceedings from afar, threatening jokingly to face off with the Democrats by coming to “sit right in the front row and stare at their corrupt faces.”

The challenge before the House managers has been clear. Democrats were given 24 hours over three days to prosecute the charges against Trump, trying to win over not just fidgety senators sitting silently in the chamber but an American public, deeply divided over the president and his impeachment in an election year.

Most senators sat at their desks throughout the day, as the rules stipulated, though some stretched their legs, standing behind the desks or against the back wall of the chamber, passing the time. Visitors watched from the galleries, one briefly interrupting in protest.

After a long and boring morning, Schiff bizarrely suggested that Ukraine desperately needs United States military aid so we don’t have to fight the Russians “here.”

“As one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry, the United States aids Ukraine and her people so that we can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here,” Schiff claimed.

***The Best Looking Trump Beanie On The Planet – YOURS FREE***

“Liberals used to mock Bush supporters when they used this jingoistic line during the war on Iraq,” said journalist Max Blumenthal. “Now they deploy it to justify an imperialist proxy war against a nuclear power.”

WATCH the moment below:

An even more appalling comment by Schiff came when he said that the President must be removed from office by the Senate opposed from the American people because he cannot be “assured” that the election “will be fairly won.”

“The president’s misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won,” Schiff said.

Many people including those on the left made sure to hammer the representative for his outlandish claims.

“And right here is proof of the Democrats’ plan all along,” President Trump’s campaign director of communications Tim Murtaugh said. “Every moment of the impeachment sham has been geared toward interfering with the 2020 election. Schiff is preemptively calling into question the results of an election that is still more than 9 months away.”

The Nation contributor Aaron Mate tweeted: “For all the talk about Russia undermining faith in US elections, how about Russiagaters like Schiff fear-mongering w/ hysterics like this? Let’s assume Ukraine did what Trump wanted: announce a probe of Burisma. Would that delegitimize a 2020 US election? This is a joke.”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

BREAKING: Epstein’s Mistress’ Emails Hacked, Damaging Info on Elites Could Be Released

According to a new bombshell report, Jeffrey Epstein’s “partner” Ghislaine Maxwell’s emails were recently hacked which included potentially damaging information relating to high profile individuals.






“The revelation was made in a letter filed by the British socialite’s lawyers in the defamation case brought against her by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Guiffre,” The Daily Mail reported. “The letter was sent by Maxwell’s attorney, Ty Gee, on December 5 to New York federal court Judge Loretta A. Preska but made public last week. The letter addresses the materials that should remain sealed or redacted in the case.”

According to the letter, publicly released documents from the U.S. Court of Appeals did not correctly redact private information.

The letter reads:

Despite the Second Circuit’s best efforts, it made serious mistakes. For example, it redacted a non-party’s name in one location but not another; so the media immediately gained access to that name.

As another example, it redacted Ms. Maxwell’s email address (which linked to her own domain name) in one location but not another; shortly afterward hackers breached the host computer.

The hack could be terrible news for Maxwell and high profile people considering “the email security breach means that 58-year-old Maxwell’s emails could be sold or leaked to the public and potentially reveal more details about individuals connected to Epstein.”

***The Best Looking Trump Beanie On The Planet – YOURS FREE***

The Telegraph suggests that “a rogue state” could possibly be behind the attack, noting that lawyers in the United States were trying to stop the release of 8,500 documents that are “said to contain damaging new sex claims about Epstein’s vast network of celebrity friends.”

“It appears from her email address, which the Telegraph is choosing not to publish, that Ms Maxwell had set up her own secret mail server rather than entrusting her messages to major providers like Google or Yahoo. The server appears to have been run through a New York-based website registered under the name Jennifer Turner, an apparent pseudonym,” The Telegraph stated. “Running a personal server can offer added legal protection against handover requests from law enforcement, but it can also leave emails more vulnerable to hackers.”

Maxwell has been under FBI investigation since last December. Check out what Reuters reported:

The FBI is investigating British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and several other people linked to U.S. financier Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, according to two law enforcement sources familiar with the investigation.

They said a principal focus of the FBI’s investigation is Maxwell, a longtime associate of Epstein, and other “people who facilitated” Epstein’s allegedly illegal behavior.

The Sun suggests that Maxwell has so much dirt on the elites that she personally “believes she will escape prosecution and return to her high society party life once ‘the dust has settled’, according to a pal of Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged madam.”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link

Categories
News

State AGs Write Scathing Letter, Urge Senate To Reject ‘Dangerous’ Impeachment Precedent

While Washington is consumed by impeachment fever, nearly half of the country’s state attorney generals are speaking out to condemn the Democrat coup against President Trump. 

In an unprecedented letter to the Senate signed by 21 state attorney generals, the top law enforcement officials rebuked the impeachment and warned that:






“This impeachment proceeding threatens all future elections and establishes a dangerous historical precedent”

URGENT POLL: Do you support Trump against Dem impeachment efforts?

The letter urges senators to reject the Pelosi-Schiff-Nadler sham and emphasizes that the impeachment was concocted as a politically motivated scheme to reverse the 2016 election which they lost as well as to improperly influence the upcoming one this year. 

Via The Washington Examiner, “‘Dangerous historical precedent’: Republican state attorneys general admonish impeachment in letter to Senate”:

Twenty-one Republican state attorneys general sent a letter to the Senate rebuking the impeachment of President Trump, claiming it would set a dangerous precedent moving forward.

The letter, which was sent on Wednesday morning, called for the Senate to dismiss the charges and end the trial, according to Fox News.

“This impeachment proceeding threatens all future elections and establishes a dangerous historical precedent,” it read. “That new precedent will erode the separation of powers shared by the executive and legislative branches by subjugating future Presidents to the whims of the majority opposition party in the House of Representatives.”

The attorneys general added, “Thus, our duty to current and future generations commands us to urge the Senate to not only reject the two articles of impeachment … as lacking in any plausible or reasonable evidentiary basis, but also as being fundamentally flawed as a matter of constitutional law.”

They went on to argue that the abuse of power charge against the president “is based upon a constitutionally-flawed theory” that is “infinitely expansive and subjective” because it is contingent upon knowing the motivation of the president. The attorneys general also claim that the second charge, obstruction of Congress, is “equally flawed” because it would ultimately render executive privilege “meaningless.”

The letter comes as the Democrat impeachment managers led by Adam Schiff have now come out and admitted before the Senate that the real reason why they seek to have President Trump removed from office is because he is going to win in November and that cannot be tolerated. 

FREE Trump 2020 T-Shirt – Get Yours Today

According to the letter:

Impeachment should never be a partisan response to one party losing a presidential election. If successful, an impeachment proceeding nullifies the votes of millions of citizens. The Democrat-controlled House passing of these constitutionally-deficient articles of impeachment amounts, at bottom, to a partisan political effort that undermines the democratic process itself.

That is exactly what is happening because in their rapacious lust for power, Democrats are determined to nullify the 63 million Americans who voted to elect Trump in 2016 and the tens of millions more who will vote for him again in November if he is not removed by the Senate. 

By embracing the Soviet model, the current version of the Democratic party loves to pay lip service to “democracy” despite being anti-democracy to their very core and this cannot stand if America is to remain a free country. 

Take it from the state attorneys.

Source link

Categories
News

Trump Legal Team Drops Bomb On Nadler During Impeachment Trial

President Donald Trump’s legal team is fighting back big time against Democrats and the countless lies they are telling about the president during the Senate impeachment trial.

While speaking on Wednesday from the Senate floor, two members of Trump’s legal team issued public denunciations of the Democrats’ case — personally citing House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler in particular.






Addressing the senators, White House counsel Pat Cipollone led off the Trump team’s attack on Nadler.

“Mr. Nadler came up here and made false allegations against our team. He made false allegations against all of you. He accused you of a cover-up. He’s been making false allegations against the president,” Cipollone said.

“The only one who should be embarrassed, Mr. Nadler, is you, for the way you’ve addressed this body,” Cipollone said. “This is the United States Senate. You’re not in charge here.”

After showing the Democratic complaints about the Senate calling witnesses like former National Security Advisor John Bolton for the farce they are, Cipollone got to the real point — the danger Democrats are posing to American democracy.

“The American people pay their salaries,” he said. “And they’re here to take away their vote. They’re here to take away their voice.”

“They have attacked the president, the executive branch. They have attacked the judicial branch. They say they don’t have time for courts. They have attacked the United States Senate, repeatedly. It’s about time we bring this power trip in for a landing,” he said.

Cipollone’s conclusion was dead on.

“Mr. Nadler, you owe an apology to the president of the United States and his family. You owe an apology to the Senate,” he said.

“But most of all, you owe an apology to the American people.”

WATCH:

Fellow team member Jay Sekulow came up to bat next — and he also hit a home run.

He branded the Democrats — and Nadler in particular — “treacherous.”

“To shred the Constitution on the floor of the Senate, to serve what purpose?” Sekulow said.

He contrasted the hypocrisy of Democratic positions now on Trump’s claims of executive privilege with their willingness to accept the same claims from the Barack Obama White House where he never faced any serious impeachment effort even when Republicans controlled both houses of Congress.

“That’s the way it works, Mr. Nadler? Is that the way you view the United States Constitution?” Sekulow asked.

“Because that’s not the way it was written. That is not the way it’s interpreted. And that’s not the way the American people should have to live.”

Source link