JUSTICE! CNN Settles Lawsuit With Covington Student After They Viciously Slandered Him

Moments ago, Fox 19 in Covington reported that CNN has finally settled the lawsuit laid down by high school student Nick Sandmann.

Here’s their full report:

COVINGTON, Ky. (FOX19) – CNN agreed Tuesday to settle a lawsuit with Covington Catholic student Nick Sandmann.

The amount of the settlement was not made public during a hearing at the federal courthouse in Covington, Kentucky.

Sandmann’s lawsuit sought $800 million from CNN, the Washington Post and NBC Universal.

Trial dates are still not set for Sandmann’s lawsuit against NBC Universal and the Washington Post.

The Washington Post suit sought $250 million. A federal judge let a portion of the suit go forward after The Post filed a motion to dismiss it.

Justice has been served!

CNN slandered and attack this young man even though he did nothing wrong, and now they’re going to pay DEARLY for it.

Here’s how Twitter reacted to the news:

What is your reaction? Are you happy to see scum CNN get what they deserved? Comment below…

Source link


REAL NEWS: Arson, Not Climate Change, To Blame For Australia’s Bushfires

While the world wails over the highly dramatized Australian bushfires that have been raging for the last three months, new information has emerged that shows that arsonists, not climate change, account for the increased devastation.

Police in Australia have arrested and charged two dozen people they say deliberately lit blazes during the wildfire season that has so far killed at least 18 people, destroyed thousands of homes and ravaged over 10 million acres of land.

New South Wales police said that since the beginning of November, 24 people have been charged over allegedly deliberately lighting fires as officers continue to investigate the role that arson has played in the devastation. Starting a wildfire can result in a jail sentence of up to 21 years.

Since that Greta Thunberg and the climate-change-crazies have been claiming that humans are to blame to the climate crisis in Australia, they actually were partly right.

Unfortunately for them, it was not all due to carbon emissions but rather purposefully setting fires, many by “vanity arsonists.”

From the Daily Mail:

Mitch Parish, a former arson squad detective, said the international frenzy surrounding the bushfire crisis would only increase a ‘vanity arsonists’ desire to light an inferno. 

‘It’s got to the stage where they’re seeing all the publicity on the fires … and they get bit of a buzz because of all the attention,’ Mr Parish said.

‘People get very emotional and passionate (about fires) and feel a lot of power because it’s a very ­destructive force.’ 

Another interesting fact is that arsonists starting fires in Australia isn’t that uncommon according to BBC:

Two of the most recent studies say there are between 52,000 and 54,000 bushfires in Australia every year.

Dr Paul Read, co-director of Australia’s National Centre for Research in Bushfire and Arson, puts the figure higher, at “62,000 and increasing”.

Of those, 13% are started deliberately, and 37% are suspicious. That means 31,000 Australian bushfires are either arson, or suspected arson, every year.

That figure does not include recklessness or accidents. So a bushfire caused by a barbecue, or a spark from a chainsaw, would be classed as “accidental”.

In short, up to 85 bushfires begin every day because someone leaves their house and decides to start one.

But this information is very inconvenient for the celebrities that have been using the Australian fires to push their climate change agenda, and so there is already a movement towards silencing this new information, claiming that there’s a “disinformation campaign.”

From the Guardian:

Bot and troll accounts are involved in a “disinformation campaign” exaggerating the role of arson in Australia’s bushfire disaster, social media analysis suggests.

The bushfires burning across the nation have been accompanied by repeated suggestions of an arson epidemic or “arson emergency”.

The false claims are, in some cases, used to undermine the link between the current bushfires and the longer, more intense fire seasons brought about by climate change.

The most recent fire seasons have been longer and dryer in recent years, but what climate change activists don’t like to tell you (or they don’t know) is that the devastating bushfires in Australia are not new, and have been documented since the 1800’s as weather patterns are cyclical and continue to change.

But bushfires in Australian are necessary, as some of the flora are actually dependent upon bushfires as a means of reproduction:

Bushfires in Australia impact extensive areas and cause property damage and have accounted for the deaths of 800 people in Australia since 1851, and millions of animals.

A small amount of Australia’s native flora have evolved to rely on bushfires as a means of reproduction – for example grass trees following fire duress will send up large flower spikes to assist in procreation of the species, however the mother plants usually die off the following season – and fire events were in the past an interwoven part of the ecology of the continent. 

So thanks to some crafty pyromaniacs, Australia seems to be having quite a doozy of a fire season that has claimed 25 lives so far

Australian authorities are clear that there will be no mercy for those that have been setting the blazes:

The wildfires are among the worst to hit Australia since the so-called Black Saturday fires in 2009 which killed 173 people, according to In 1974, 117 million hectares of land was burnt in wildfires in central Australia.

Meanwhile, police have also warned that those who exploit the devastation of the fire will face the full force of the law, as three people were charged over alleged looting in bushfire-affected areas on the South Coast.

In a press conference, NSW Police Deputy Commissioner Gary Worboys said: “It’s disgusting behavior. It’s behavior we won’t tolerate simply because the community will not tolerate it either. People’s homes are their castles and particularly in these times of devastation it really does go against the grain of Australian people…we will take action.”

Source link


Rush Limbaugh Explains Why Democrats Defend Terrorists Over America

On Monday, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh returned from his Christmas break to address the ongoing meltdown from the left after President Trump approved a drone strike that killed Iranian terrorist Qassem Soleimani.

“So what happened?” Limbaugh started. “The president kills a well-known terrorist who is responsible for the death of hundreds of Americans, including uniformed military personnel, and the left melts down. The left has a breakdown.”

Limbaugh explains that the reason why the left is having a breakdown is because of the fact that Donald Trump is President.

“If anybody is puzzled by this, all you have to do is go back to when Trump came down the escalator on June 15th of 2016 and announced his slogan Make America Great Again,” Limbaugh said. “Remember how controversial that was? Make America Great Again, what’s controversial about that? What in the world is controversial about America first?”

“But it is to the American left,” he continued. “And therein lies the explanation for all this.”

Limbaugh then went onto break down the situation and specifically talked about how Twitter is exposing the left.

***The Best Looking Trump Beanie On The Planet – YOURS FREE***

“Twitter, in my mind, has become useful,” he said. “Now, Snerdly and the gang on the other side of the glass are looking perplexed and puzzled because it is well known that I think of sewer and Twitter as inseparable. But Twitter is highly useful right now. Twitter is allowing the left and today’s Democrats and the media to show normal people how freaking insane they are.”

“As I watch this display, as I watch the left melt down over the death of a genuine enemy of the people of this country and side with an enemy nation over their own country and president, I wonder how many Americans, independents, what have you, who are on the fence see this and are shocked and surprised by it,” he said.

“Why is the left being so blatant in their support for an enemy nation? Why is the left, why is the Democrat Party going out of its way to tell everybody that they actually prefer the mullahs in Iran and this dead terrorist, Qassem Soleimani?” Limbaugh questioned. He answered, saying that President Trump’s slogan is why the Democratic party is upset about Soleimani’s death.

“To normal, decent, common citizen Americans, what in the world is controversial about that: Make America Great Again? The answer is very simple,” he said. “There are a lot of people in the Democrat Party that don’t think America ever has been great, do not think America can be great (because of our founding), don’t believe America deserves to be great and, in fact, thinks America’s guilty — and they have now become the mainstream media of the Democrat Party.”

“Madeleine Albright’s out there teaching young skulls full of mush there’s nothing special about America — it’s just a coincidence, just an accident — and that the United States as a singular superpower is a destabilizing element in the world,” he continued.

“That view, that America alone as a superpower is destabilizing is a view widely held in the civil service throughout the State Department,” Rush stated. ”It’s not an obscure view. It’s not a minority view. It took me a long time to learn this, long time to believe it, long time to understand it, long time to accept it.”

“A lot of people don’t want to accept that in our own government, there are people who do not believe in the goodness of the United States, the concept of America as the good guys,” he said. “But you’re looking at it! In every bit of this opposition to what Trump has done, you’re seeing it.”

Limbaugh then brought former President Barack Obama into the mix.

“Obama had the same view of the Middle East that he and Madeleine Albright and all the rest of them have of the United States,” said Limbaugh. “The Middle East was destabilized when only Israel was an economic and military power… One of the reasons the Obama administration entered into the Iran deal, one of the reasons that they engaged Iran, one of the reasons that Obama dropped off $150 billion in cash on the tarmac in Tehran — and don’t think that some of it didn’t get to Qassem Soleimani.”

Rush then pointed out how Obama was completely aware that some of the money given to Iran was used to fund terrorism through Soleimani. “They were making deals with this guy,” he said. “They knew exactly who he was. Obama believed that empowering Iran would stabilize the Middle East, provide a counterbalance to Israel. Because once again, the Israelis are not seen as the good guys, even though they are a United States ally.”

Limbaugh continues and explains that when the left sees President Trump killing Soleimani, they see “an assault on Obama, an assault on Obama’s foreign policy, an effort and an attempt to unravel and unwind it.”

“And they’re right,” he said. “Trump is unwinding it, unraveling a horrible Middle Eastern policy from the Obama administration.”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link


Biden In 2008: The President Can Strike to Prevent an Attack

In the midst of the criticism President Trump has faced after he approved a mission to kill one of the world’s biggest terrorists, an old quote from Joe Biden in 2008 has resurfaced, revealing that 2008 Biden would have supporter President Trump’s attack.

Since the attack, Biden has blasted President Trump, saying that he “does not have the authority to take us into war with Iran without Congressional approval.”

“Let’s be clear: Donald Trump does not have the authority to take us into war with Iran without Congressional approval. A president should never take this nation to war without the informed consent of the American people,” he tweeted.

This tweet is extremely hypocritical considering Biden said the exact opposite in 2008 while campaigning with former President Barack Obama.

On his campaign website, Biden discussed his Iran policy, writing, “It is precisely because the consequences of war – intended or otherwise – can be so profound and complicated that our Founding Fathers vested in Congress, not the President, the power to initiate war, except to repel an imminent attack on the United States or its citizens.”

Check out what the Daily Caller reported:

The portion about preventing an “imminent attack” is key, as the State Department claimed in a statement following the Soleimani strike that the general was plotting to attack U.S. facilities and service members in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon. The attack was “imminent” and could have killed hundreds of Americans, U.S. Special representative for Iran Brian Hook claimed.

According to Biden’s 2008 view, the president would have ample authority to take out Soleimani. It’s also tenuous if the targeted drone strike is equivalent to war — Iran’s US ambassador claimed the move was an “act of war,” but Trump has stated that he approved the strike in order to “stop a war.”

Biden is proving to be one of the biggest liars and hypocrites on the campaign trail especially after the drone strike in Iran.

The former Vice President is now claiming that he supported the military raid that killed Osama Bin Laden despite comments he made back in 2012.

On Friday, Biden claimed that he had not urged Obama to hold off on the raid that killed Bin Laden.

The moment came when Fox News’ Peter Doocy asked the former Vice President if he would have made the same decision as President Trump to kill Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani.

“As commander in chief, if you were ever handed a piece of intelligence that said you could stop an imminent attack on Americans — but you have to use an airstrike to take out a terrorist leader — would you pull the trigger?” Doocy asked.

“Well we did – the guy’s name was Usama bin Laden,” Biden stated.

“Didn’t you tell President Obama not to go after bin Laden that day?” Doocy questioned.

“No, I didn’t,” Biden replied.

This was a flat out lie considering Biden publicly stated back in 2012 that he told former NOT to go after Bin Laden.

“Mr. President, my suggestion is, don’t go — we have to do two more things to see if he’s there,” Biden said back in 2012.


What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link