REPORT: Barack Obama Mulling Denouncement Of Bernie Sanders

The Democrat establishment is in a state of sheer panic over the candidacy of Bernie Sanders and are looking to once again sink his campaign as they did in 2016.

With one of the most dismal slates of candidates in American political history, the Dems are having a hard time selling borderline senile Joe Biden to voters and drastic actions are in order. 

According to reports, with Sanders still running strong in the polls and especially in the critical early Iowa caucuses, Democrats may be prepared to roll out the heavy artillery. 

According to sources wishing to remain anonymous out of fear of a savage retaliation, Barack Obama himself is preparing to denounce Sanders in order to cut him off at the knees before he becomes unstoppable. 

Via Fox Business, “Obama feels Sanders is unfit to battle Trump – and he has told people he might say so publicly”:

Former President Barack Obama has remained mostly silent through the early stages of the Democratic race to unseat Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election but that may soon change, friends and associates tell FOX Business, as avowed socialist Bernie Sanders gains in national polls and seems poised to obtain front-runner status.

Obama has told people in private that Sanders is both temperamentally and politically unfit to beat Trump in the 2020 general election, these people say. Among his concerns are Sanders’ strident form of politics and confrontational manners where he was known not to seek compromise during his long years in the US senate. Meanwhile, Obama is said to worry that Sanders’ far-left policies, which include massive tax increases, free college tuition and massive student debt forgiveness, would alienate even traditional Democratic voters. And may alienate them enough to re-elect Trump, who is seeking a second term despite historically low favorability ratings given his own bombastic style, these people tell FOX Business.

Officially, Mr. Obama’s excuse for meddling in the primary process is that he believes the braying old socialist would get creamed by President Trump although skeptics would be quick to point out that the DNC losing control of the party is the true reason for his willingness to throw down. 

Obama has reaped the rewards of his time in office with fame, fortune and a massive waterfront mansion in swanky Martha’s Vineyard and like others, he doesn’t want to kill the goose that laid the golden egg. 


Former Democrat presidential candidate and sore loser Hillary Clinton also attacked Bernie, blasting him as “full of baloney,” a “career politician” and claiming that “nobody likes him” in an interview to promote her four-part Hulu documentary. 

The problem with Dem bigwigs going gangster on Bernie is that it risks emboldening him and his army of devoted followers who are attracted to their leader’s siren song of free stuff and are determined to bring about a socialist revolution in America. 

To Bernie’s loyalists, being condemned by the likes of Obama and Hillary are a badge of honor and will only harden their resolve. 

The potential for an open civil war within the Democratic party is already there and an Obama denouncement of Sanders may just be the spark that ignites it. 

Source link


Gowdy Exposes Adam Schiff’s ‘Wildly Stupid’ Impeachment Trial Strategy

Chief Democrat impeachment commissar Adam Schiff and his merry band of managers have had three days to present their case and it is already an unmitigated disaster. 

It was always going to be a tough task to convince the Senate that an election should be reversed and a duly elected president be thrown out of office on the flimsy accusations that were the basis of their impeachment articles but Schiff has shot himself in the foot. 

According to former Republican congressman Trey Gowdy, the California Democrat’s impeachment strategy is “wildly stupid” and likely doomed to failure. 

URGENT POLL: Do you support Trump against Dem impeachment efforts?

Gowdy was referring to Schiff’s insistence that President Trump must be ousted because the American people can’t be trusted to pick the nation’s leader – a stunning statement that reveals just how much contempt that Democrats have for elections when they don’t win or can’t rig in their favor. 

During an interview with Fox News host Brett Baier, the former House Oversight Committee chairman roasted Schiff over not only his refuting of democracy but also for the accusation that Senate members are corrupt and a part of a cover-up.

Via The Political Insider:

Fox News host Bret Baier queried Gowdy on what he called ‘the big question’

“Is the way that Adam Schiff said it, do voters never get to trust the vote and only lawmakers can decide what the line is, that a president can get kicked out of office for?” Baier asked.

Gowdy didn’t hold back, starting off with a ‘but’ that you simply knew was going to leave a mark on Schiff.

“Yeah, Brett, Adam’s ordinarily not that stupid but when you tell the jury, the Senate, on one day that they’re corrupt and then you tell the American people they cannot be trusted to pick the commander in chief, that’s just a wildly stupid trial strategy,” he replied.

“Remember when Donald Trump, as a candidate, began to question the reliability of the vote?” Gowdy asked Baier.

“Well Adam Schiff has done exactly the same thing,” he continued assuming a Democrat’s voice. “American people, we don’t trust you to factor this in in November, so we need a hundred senators to decide that.”

Gowdy reiterated, “It is a wildly stupid trial strategy, only surpassed by Jerry Nadler’s insulting of the jury two days ago.”

NEWLY RELEASED Trump 2020 Hat – Yours Free

Gowdy was referring to Nadler’s meltdown on the Senate floor in which he unleashed the Dems’ latest conspiracy theory that senators who don’t obey Schiff his fellow impeachment managers by allowing them to hijack the trial, that they are guilty of a cover-up. 

Not exactly a way to win friends and influence people. 

There is wildly stupid and then there is the current incarnation of the Democratic party which eschews elections in favor of bogus allegations, show trials, demonizing of their opponents and a propaganda system that would be the envy of third-world dictators. 

Insulting the voters in such a manner isn’t going to win any converts in the “flyover states” of middle America that Schiff and the cultural elitist Hollywood snobs that inhabit his district sneer at. 

Nor is it going to sway many Republicans to overthrow President Trump in an election year no matter what Schiff says. 

Source link


Nadler Makes Impeachment U-Turn After Bogus Ukraine Allegations Fail

Democrats and their impeachment managers have not gained any traction with their Ukraine hoax as a reason to remove President Trump from office so they are now once again, lying about Russian collusion.

Let’s face it. This impeachment sham was always going to happen regardless of what Nancy Pelosi said but the “evidence” that was supposed to underpin their coup to reverse the 2016 election imploded when Robert Mueller failed to deliver.

So they came up with a convoluted ginned-up case against Trump over the alleged withholding of millions of dollars in aid to the corrupt former Soviet country that Dems ran their rackets out of during the Obama years but it failed to catch fire.

URGENT POLL: Do you support Trump against Dem impeachment efforts?

Dems quickly went to Plan B – RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA… 

So there was House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler invoking the great Putin boogeyman on CBS’s “Face The Nation” where he flogged the dead horse that Trump was in cahoots with the Kremlin to cheat Hillary out of the presidency that she was entitled to.

According to Nadler via the transcript:

The GAO, the General Accountability Office, just came out this week and pointed out that withholding money from Uk- from Ukraine that Congress had appropriated is against the law. 

But we didn’t need them to tell us that. And the reason he did that was in order to extort a foreign government to- to smear his political opponents for his personal benefits and to help try to rig the 2020 election as he worked with the Russians to try to rig the 2016 election. The same pattern. 

So, there is no question that working with a foreign- working with a foreign power, trying to extort a foreign power to interfere in our election is about as bad as you can imagine. 

But Mueller never had a shred of evidence that this occurred and other than jackleg scoundrels like Nadler, conspiracy theory mills like MSNBC and the lunatic fringe on Twitter, the Russian collusion delusion ranks up there with such beauties as the moon landing was a fake, a missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11 and that the world will end in ten years due to climate change. 

EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Which of these 6 Trump products would you like for FREE?

It has not been a good week for the longtime enemy of Trump who with impeachment sees a way to avenge years of battles during their time in New York and the billionaire real estate developer’s mockery of the congressman as “Fat Jerry.” 

His meltdown in the Senate where he accused Republican senators of being engaged in a cover-up earned him a rebuke from Justice John Roberts although it didn’t deter either he or Adam Schiff from repeatedly playing the Russia card in front of their captive audience. 

According to Schiff:

“It’s a breathtaking success of Russian intelligence. I don’t know if there’s ever been a greater success of Russian intelligence. Whatever profile Russia did of our president, boy did they have him spot on — flattery and propaganda, flattery and propaganda is all Russia needed,” 

“This is just the most incredible propaganda coup because as I said yesterday, it’s not just that the president of the United States standing next to Vladimir Putin is reading Kremlin talking points. He won’t read his own national security staff talking points.”

Despite being repeatedly debunked, Russian collusion is the last refuge of scoundrels and Democrats like Nadler have repeated this big lie often enough that they may actually believe it now. 

Source link


Jim Jordan Destroys Schiff’s Credibility in One Minute

Troubled far-left Representative Adam Schiff has tried to convince the American people for months that President Donald Trump should be impeached because he is a threat to America. 

During an interview on Wednesday, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan destroyed Schiff’s credibility by discussing past statements by Schiff that turned out to be completely false.

“We’re supposed to believe Adam Schiff today and everything he’s saying?” Jordan started. “This is the guy who said, ‘We have more than circumstantial evidence that there was coordination between Trump and Russia, and Russia influenced the election.’ That turned out to be false. Adam Schiff said that the Nunes was false. Michael Horowitz told us no it wasn’t; it was exactly right. Adam Schiff said you can trust the FISA court. Michael Horowitz told us last month that no, you can’t; they lied to the FISA court 17 times. Adam Schiff told us we look forward to hearing from the whistleblower. Adam Schiff said we’ve had no contact with the whistleblower.”

He continued: “Then just yesterday, the story where he misrepresents to all of you to Chairman [Jerry] Nadler and most importantly to the White House counsel that Mr. Z is Mr. Zelensky, when in fact it was Mr. Zlochevsky. But today we’re supposed to believe him? He just talked for two hours and 15 minutes, and we’re supposed to believe everything he said today, in spite of that history, where seven important things he had exactly wrong? … That’s the kind of game that they’re playing here, and, again, I think that the American people see through it all.”

WATCH the clip below:

Schiff has little to no credibility left considering he continues to promote falsehoods and conspiracy theories.

During the impeachment trial on Wednesday, Schiff said that Russia would attack the United States mainland and the only way of preventing this would be to remove President Trump from office.

Check out what Fox News reported:

Trump’s lawyers sat by, waiting their turn, as the president blasted the proceedings from afar, threatening jokingly to face off with the Democrats by coming to “sit right in the front row and stare at their corrupt faces.”

The challenge before the House managers has been clear. Democrats were given 24 hours over three days to prosecute the charges against Trump, trying to win over not just fidgety senators sitting silently in the chamber but an American public, deeply divided over the president and his impeachment in an election year.

Most senators sat at their desks throughout the day, as the rules stipulated, though some stretched their legs, standing behind the desks or against the back wall of the chamber, passing the time. Visitors watched from the galleries, one briefly interrupting in protest.

After a long and boring morning, Schiff bizarrely suggested that Ukraine desperately needs United States military aid so we don’t have to fight the Russians “here.”

“As one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry, the United States aids Ukraine and her people so that we can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here,” Schiff claimed.

***The Best Looking Trump Beanie On The Planet – YOURS FREE***

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link


ABC Host In Hot Water After Camera Catches Him Making ‘Kill’ Gesture While Trump Lawyer Speaks

During a live broadcast on ABC News, host George Stephanopoulos made a “slit the throat” hand motion while reacting to President Donald Trump’s attorney who was defending the president against the impeachment accusations made in the Senate trial.

The incident happened on Thursday as President Trump’s lawyer Jay Sekulow outlined his defense for President Trump while speaking to reporters.

Sekulow strongly went against the House impeachment managers’ claims against President Trump, stating that he would present “multiple schools of thought” that will explain how the President did not “reach the level” of an impeachable offense.

“We will be putting on a vigorous defense of both facts, and rebutting what they’ve said,” Sekulow said. “Our job here is to defend the president, the office of the presidency and the Constitution.”

ABC News quickly cut from the footage of the interview to Stephanopoulos who was seen making a “slit the throat” hand motion.

Check out what the Pluralist reported:

During a live broadcast of Sekulow’s remarks, ABC News briefly cut back to Stephanopoulos, who could be seen making a motion with his hand across his neck.

The veteran news anchor and former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton was visibly embarrassed after realizing the cameras caught him performing the gesture.

Newsbuster executive editor Tim Graham, who uploaded footage of the moment to Twitter on Thursday, suggested Stephanopoulos’ “slit-the-throat ‘kill’ gesture” was a signal for ABC News to cut away from Sekulow’s remarks.

WATCH the clip below:

Members of the media like Stephanopoulos aren’t going to be too happy with the outcome of the impeachment trial considering Republicans appear to be sticking together.

On Wednesday, Republican Senator Rand Paul told The Washington Post that Senate Republicans are close to having the votes necessary to completely dismiss the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

“There are 45, with about five to eight wanting to hear a little more,” Paul said. The Senate needs 51 votes to completely dismiss the articles of impeachment. “I still would like to dismiss it, but there aren’t the votes to do it just yet.”

Paul continued by commenting on Rep. Adam Schiff’s involvement in the trial, stating that he is helping unify Republicans.

“I will push it at some point,” Paul said. “The more Adam Schiff speaks, the more we become unified.”

The Republican Senator also spoke out against the Democrats’ calls to have former National Security Adviser John Bolton testify in the Senate. “He’s a disgruntled employee with an ax to grind,” Paul said.

“Some people who have talked to him think he has an ax to grind, that he’s angry he was publicly fired by the president,” Paul added. “But he also has a history of believing in unlimited powers for the president. Which is the guiding light for John Bolton at this point? Axe to grind and books to sell? Or, be a player and say ‘even if I’m gone, he’s doing what I want on Iran and other things?’”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link


REPORT: Obama Will Speak Out Publicly If This 1 Dem Secures Nomination

According to a new Fox Business report, former President Barack Obama is considering getting involved with the 2020 Democratic primary if he feels that socialist Bernie Sanders may clinch the nomination.

“Former President Barack Obama has remained mostly silent through the early stages of the Democratic race to unseat Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election but that may soon change, friends and associates tell FOX Business, as avowed socialist Bernie Sanders gains in national polls and seems poised to obtain front-runner status,” Fox Business reported. “He has recently grown even more wary of Sanders as the Vermont senator appears to be gaining momentum in polls and the Democratic primaries begin to heat up with the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary both in February.”

“Obama has told people in private that Sanders is both temperamentally and politically unfit to beat Trump in the 2020 general election, these people say,” Fox Business continued. “Among his concerns are Sanders’ strident form of politics and confrontational manners where he was known not to seek compromise during his long years in the US senate. Meanwhile, Obama is said to worry that Sanders’ far-left policies, which include massive tax increases, free college tuition and massive student debt forgiveness, would alienate even traditional Democratic voters.”

If Obama feels that Sanders is gaining steam in the primary race, he will get involved according to the news outlet.

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

Obama’s concerns are very similar to those of failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton who expressed her distaste for Sanders to The Hollywood Reporter.

The Hollywood Reporter said to Clinton: “In the doc, you’re brutally honest on Sanders: ‘He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It’s all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it.’ That assessment still hold?”

Clinton replied, “Yes, it does.”

Clinton added, “it’s not only him, it’s the culture around him. It’s his leadership team. It’s his prominent supporters. It’s his online Bernie Bros and their relentless attacks on lots of his competitors, particularly the women.”

“And I really hope people are paying attention to that because it should be worrisome that he has permitted this culture — not only permitted, [he] seems to really be very much supporting it,” Clinton continued. “And I don’t think we want to go down that road again where you campaign by insult and attack and maybe you try to get some distance from it, but you either don’t know what your campaign and supporters are doing or you’re just giving them a wink and you want them to go after Kamala [Harris] or after Elizabeth [Warren]. I think that that’s a pattern that people should take into account when they make their decisions.”

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!

Source link


LIMBAUGH: The Democrats’ Disgraceful Hail Mary

Commentary by David Limbaugh

I don’t know about you, but I’m a little tired of Rep. Adam Schiff and the Democratic horde’s portraying every charge against President Donald Trump as Trump’s effort to interfere with this or that election.

In his opening statement at the Senate impeachment trial, Lead House Impeachment Manager Schiff, puffed up with false indignation, did it again. President Trump made an “attempt to use the powers of the presidency to cheat in an election,” said Schiff, and he must be impeached.

He’s claiming that the 2020 election, which won’t happen until November, will be illegitimate because of Trump’s dastardly telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“The president’s misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won,” he said. Come on! How dim does he think the viewing public is?

The only thing illegitimate is Schiff’s argument — and as an experienced former prosecutor, he knows it. Even viewing Trump’s actions in the most negative light, nothing happened beyond a conversation. Neither the conversation nor anything that resulted from it could hurt the eventual Democratic nominee’s chances of winning. The same cannot be said, however, about this endless witch hunt against President Trump. The same cannot be said about all the vicious lies Schiff and company have leveled against Trump. Almost everything they’ve done is aimed at “interfering” with the 2016 and 2020 elections, if I may borrow that term.

They used to claim Trump just tried to interfere with the 2020 election, which was dubious enough, given that they can’t prove Trump’s motive was to sabotage Joe Biden. As I’ve said before, it is more likely that Trump was trying to uncover Democratic interference with his successful 2016 bid.  

But now they’re saying Trump actually succeeded in tainting the upcoming election. Could someone please walk us through the logic? I am serious. How could Trump’s call possibly affect the outcome of the 2020 election when nothing came from it? How could it undermine our assurance that the vote will be fairly won?

The irony is palpable. Just as Democrats, not Trump, have attempted to interfere with both elections, the Democrats’ unwarranted impeachment proceeding could undermine or torpedo the 2020 election if Schiff gets his way and Trump is railroaded out of office.

At least we know that’s not going to happen. Again, so does Schiff, which means the only reason he and his team are pursuing this sham is to publicly shame Trump and hinder his reelection bid, their scheme to reverse the 2016 election having gone down in flames.

Schiff also claims that Trump believes “he’s above the law” and engaged in one of “the most blatant efforts of a cover-up in history.” A cover-up? Trump knew when he made the call that other people were aware he was making it. He didn’t even try to hide it in the beginning. And why would he? The transcript shows he didn’t believe he was doing anything wrong. He has repeatedly called for an investigation into the Democrats who have been trying to oust him and cripple his presidency.

Just as it was bad faith for Democrats to accuse Trump of obstructing the investigation into his alleged collusion with Russia, because there was demonstrably no such collusion and thus no reason to obstruct, it is bad faith for them to accuse him of obstructing this investigation, because there’s nothing for him to obstruct. He sucked the oxygen right out of them when he released the transcript, something they never banked on.  

It’s also preposterous to claim he committed an impeachable offense merely by invoking his privileges and other rights — unless you define obstructing Congress as refusing to roll over and play dead for the quite honorable Adam Schiff.  

The House Democrats didn’t first ask the courts to compel witnesses to testify but instead jumped straight to declaring Trump’s blocking their testimony an impeachable offense. So much for the separation of powers. “If I were the president, I wouldn’t cooperate with these guys at all,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham.

It is rich that Schiff (and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer) accuses Senate Republicans of unfairness, given that he and his cohorts unfairly denied Trump due process in the House proceedings. It is also absurd, given that Republicans are operating under similar rules that governed the impeachment trial of former President Bill Clinton.

TV viewership and polls show the Democrats’ ongoing crusade to destroy President Trump continues to backfire. How do they figure this is helping them?  

Schiff says impeachment is the only remedy. What an odd thing to say for a guy who pretends to care so much about democracy. How about just letting the voters decide in November, congressman?

Oh well. I suppose I shouldn’t complain. Democrats are just digging a deeper hole for themselves with this disgraceful Hail Mary because they fear they can’t beat Trump fairly and squarely, and so they must “interfere” with the 2020 election.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book is “Guilty by Reason of Insanity: Why the Democrats Must Not Win.” Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at


Source link


Trump Sets The Internet On Fire With Meme Of The CENTURY

As we all know, President Obama was quietly pulling the strings behind the spy operation into the Trump campaign in 2016.

They were scared to death of what would happen if Donald J. Trump got control of the White House, so they thought getting dirt and spying would help them in the election.

Sadly (for them), all of their nightmares became very real.

Although Democrats deny that Obama spied on the Trump campaign, WE THE PEOPLE know the truth.

All of that leads us to last night, when President Trump decided to set the internet on fire and post a viral meme that is probably the best image I’ve ever seen. It’s an image of Obama scaling the side of a building with a listening device in order to spy on Trump.

It’s priceless.

Here it is in all it’s glory:

No caption was given, and no caption was necessary.

As you can imagine, this tweet set the internet on fire.

It was posted less than 12 hours ago and it has nearly 260,000 likes and 64,000 retweets!

What is your reaction to this hilarious Trump meme? Comment below.

(P.S. Make sure to share it all over social media to trigger the HELL out of the liberal media!!!)

Source link


Hey Democrats, This Is What A ‘Clump Of Cells’ Looks Like When You LET IT LIVE

During today’s March for Life, an adorable young girl was found holding one of the most impactful signs of the entire day.

Her sign simply read: “Mommy’s Favorite Clump Of Cells”

It’s a powerful visualization of what that “clump of cells” would look like if Democrats and liberals would actually let them live.

Here it is:

If the tweet above doesn’t load, here is the image:

The Democrats justify having abortions because they say that it’s “just a clump of cells”, but what they don’t acknowledge is that this “clump of cells” eventually forms into a beautiful human being that God himself created…and their life should matter!

Here are some other great insights and videos from todays March For Life:

Are you proud of those who stood up and marched for LIFE today in Washington DC? Comment below…

Source link


Republicans Shuts Down Media Event, Holds Up Sign Exposing Schiff/Nadler Hypocrisy

Democratic Reps. Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler were selected as House manages to present the Democrats “case” at the Senate trial this week before the U.S. Senate — and it has not been going well.

Ratings have tanked for the Schiff show and more Americans by the day are against impeaching and removing President Donald Trump from office.

While Schiff and Nadler spent all of Wednesday and Thursday practically begging Americans to believe Trump is a threat to our democracy and must be removed from office — one Republican senator just exposed their hypocrisy with a single piece of paper.

Republican Sen. Joni Ernst responded directly the the charge by Democrats that Trump withheld aid from Ukraine by holding a sign showing votes against Ukraine aid from Schiff and Nadler.

“Ernst just held a feisty presser accusing House managers of being hypocritical by lecturing senators on Trump’s hold on Ukraine aid when they voted against the last defense bill that included aid to Ukraine. She held up a paper with their votes,” Bobic said.

This response by Ernst to the Democrat House managers echoes Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz, who asked where Democrats were when former President Barack Obama denied aide to the embattled Ukraine during his second term.

“If there is such a compelling national security interest to give military aide to Ukraine, then what do these House Democrats have to say about the years that Barack Obama refused to give lethal military aide to Ukraine?” Cruz asked on Thursday.

Late last year, Robert O’Brien — currently Trump’s National Security Advisor — appeared on CBS’s “Face the Nation” and talked about the lack of Ukraine aid provided by the Obama administration.

“I was there as part of a bipartisan election observation mission and I had young Ukrainian soldiers and young Ukrainians come up to me and say, ‘Why won’t the U.S., the arsenal of democracy, send us lethal aid? You’re sending us blankets and MREs. Why won’t President Obama send us military aid?’”

“When President Trump got into office, he sent military aid,” O’Brien said during the interview.

Former NSC Senior Director for European Affairs Tim Morrison, who listened to Trump’s call with Zelensky, testified last Wednesday that the president did not discuss anything illegal during the conversation.

Morrison testified that Ukrainian officials didn’t know certain U.S. military funding had been delayed by the Trump administration until late August 2019, which was more than a month after the Trump-Zelensky call.

This destroys the Democrats argument that Trump told Zelensky on the July 25 that he had to reopen the investigation into the Biden’s shady family business deals in order to receive the military funding.

Philip Reeker, one of the top U.S. diplomats to Europe, also testified this week that he did not know U.S. security aid was withheld to pressure Ukraine’s new president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

Democrats claim Trump withheld $391 million in military aid from Ukraine in exchange for them investigation Biden.

Reeker testified that he had no knowledge of that at all.

***EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Which of these 6 Trump products would you like for FREE?***

There’s no evidence of a quid pro quo because it never happened.

Source link